In recent years, the use of deep learning in language models gained much attention. Some research projects claim that they can generate text that can be interpreted as human- writing, enabling new possibilities in many application ar- eas. Among the different areas related to language processing, one of the most notable in applying this type of modeling is programming languages. For years, the Machine Learning community has been researching this software engineering area, pursuing goals like applying different approaches to auto-complete, generate, fix, or evaluate code programmed by humans. Considering the increasing popularity of the Deep- Learning-enabled 8 language models approach, we detected a lack of empirical papers that compare different deep learn- ing architectures to create and use language models based on programming code. This paper compares different neural network architectures like AWD-LSTMs, AWD-QRNNs, and Transformer while using transfer learning and different tokenizations to see how they behave in building language models using a Python dataset for code generation and fill- ing mask tasks. Considering the results, we discuss each approach’s different strengths and weaknesses and what gaps we find to evaluate the language models or apply them in a real programming context.